DESCRIPTIVE GRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE COVID-19 SITUATION IN ECUADOR

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53591/easi.v1i1.1768

Keywords:

COVID-19, Pandemic, Virus

Abstract

This document shows the report on the spread of the virus in Ecuador during the most critical months of the COVID-19 pandemic. The analysis was performed by applying descriptive statistical techniques through graphs generated in the free software RStudio, using packages such as ggplot2, gganimate, highchapter, among others. The statistical study is carried out with a database showing the daily records of infections and deaths by province for 187 days. The types of graphs used are dynamic bar charts and scatter diagrams that are a function of the different days of the study. In addition, a geographical map of the entire country shows the level of affectation in each zone. In this way it was possible to show that the most affected provinces were Guayas and Pichincha, which are considered the most populated. 

Author Biographies

Jeison Ávila Lucas, Facultad de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad de Guayaquil. Guayaquil, Ecuador, 090112

Facultad de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad de Guayaquil. Guayaquil, Ecuador, 090112

Luis Pilacuan Bonete, Facultad de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad de Guayaquil. Guayaquil, Ecuador, 090112

Doctor in Applied Multivariate Statistics (2023). Master in Business Administration (2015)

Karina Valenzuela Burbano, Facultad de Ingeniería Industrial, Universidad de Guayaquil. Guayaquil, Ecuador, 090112

This document shows the report on the spread of the virus in our country during the most critical months of the pandemic. The analysis was carried out applying descriptive statistics techniques through graphs generated in the free software RStudio, using its packages such as ggplot2, gganimate, highchapter, among others. The statistical study is carried out with a database that shows the daily records of infections and deaths by province for 187 days. The types of graphs used are dynamic bar and scatter diagrams that are found according to the different study days. In addition, a geographical map of the entire country, where the level of affectation in each area can be seen. In this way, it was shown that among the most affected provinces are Guayas and Pichincha, which are considered the most populated and most influential in the country. 

References

​​Afzal, M., Li, J., Amin, W., Huang, Q., Umer, K., Ahmad, S. A., Ahmad, F., & Raza, A. (2022). Role of blockchain technology in transactive energy market: A review. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 53, 102646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102646

​Alvi, S. T., Uddin, M. N., Islam, L., & Ahamed, S. (2022). DVTChain: A blockchain-based decentralized mechanism to ensure the security of digital voting system voting system. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.06.014

​Broday, D. M., Arpaci, A., Bartonova, A., Castell-Balaguer, N., Cole-Hunter, T., Dauge, F. R., Fishbain, B., Jones, R. L., Galea, K., Jovasevic-Stojanovic, M., Kocman, D., Martinez-Iñiguez, T., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Robinson, J., Svecova, V., & Thai, P. (2017). Wireless distributed environmental sensor networks for air pollution measurement-the promise and the current reality. Sensors (Switzerland), 17(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102263

​Budi, S., Susanto, F., de Souza, P., Timms, G., Malhotra, V., & Turner, P. (2018). In search for a robust design of environmental sensor networks. Environmental Technology (United Kingdom), 39(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1310303

​Chan, K., Schillereff, D. N., Baas, A. C. W., Chadwick, M. A., Main, B., Mulligan, M., O’Shea, F. T., Pearce, R., Smith, T. E. L., van Soesbergen, A., Tebbs, E., & Thompson, J. (2021). Low-cost electronic sensors for environmental research: Pitfalls and opportunities. Progress in Physical Geography, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133320956567

​Dhall, S., Mehta, B. R., Tyagi, A. K., & Sood, K. (2021). A review on environmental gas sensors: Materials and technologies. In Sensors International (Vol. 2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100116

​Guo, H., & Yu, X. (2022). A survey on blockchain technology and its security. Blockchain: Research and Applications, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2022.100067

​Han, Q., Liu, P., Zhang, H., & Cai, Z. (2019). A Wireless Sensor Network for Monitoring Environmental Quality in the Manufacturing Industry. IEEE Access, 7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2920838

​Handayani, A. S., Husni, N. L., Nurmaini, S., & Permatasari, R. (2020). Environmental Application with Multi Sensor Network. Computer Engineering and Applications, 9(1).

​Jumaah, H. J., Kalantar, B., Mansor, S., Halin, A. A., Ueda, N., & Jumaah, S. J. (2021). Development of UAV-based PM2.5 monitoring system. Drones, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5030060

​Khan, K. M., Arshad, J., & Khan, M. M. (2020). Simulation of transaction malleability attack for blockchain-based e-Voting. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106583

​Liao, Z., & Cheng, S. (2023). RVC: A reputation and voting based blockchain consensus mechanism for edge computing-enabled IoT systems. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 209, 103510. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNCA.2022.103510

​Liu, Y., & Xu, G. (2021). Fixed degree of decentralization DPoS consensus mechanism in blockchain based on adjacency vote and the average fuzziness of vague value. Computer Networks, 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108432

​Mao, F., Khamis, K., Krause, S., Clark, J., & Hannah, D. M. (2019). Low-Cost Environmental Sensor Networks: Recent Advances and Future Directions. In Frontiers in Earth Science (Vol. 7). https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00221

​Merlo, V., Pio, G., Giusto, F., & Bilancia, M. (2022). On the exploitation of the blockchain technology in the healthcare sector: A systematic review. Expert Systems with Applications, 118897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118897

​Mookherji, S., Vanga, O., & Prasath, R. (2022). Blockchain-based e-voting protocols. Blockchain Technology for Emerging Applications: A Comprehensive Approach, 239–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90193-2.00006-5

​Ooi, V., Kian Peng, S., & Soh, J. (2022). Blockchain land transfers: Technology, promises, and perils. Computer Law and Security Review, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105672

​Panja, S., & Roy, B. (2021). A secure end-to-end verifiable e-voting system using blockchain and cloud server. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2021.102815

​Perez, A. O., Bierer, B., Scholz, L., Wöllenstein, J., & Palzer, S. (2018). A wireless gas sensor network to monitor indoor environmental quality in schools. Sensors (Switzerland), 18(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124345

​Qutieshat, A., Aouididi, R., & Arfaoui, R. (2019). Design and Construction of a Low-Cost Arduino-Based pH Sensor for the Visually Impaired Using Universal pH Paper. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(10). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00450

​Rahman, M. S., Chamikara, M. A. P., Khalil, I., & Bouras, A. (2022). Blockchain-of-blockchains: An interoperable blockchain platform for ensuring IoT data integrity in smart city. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 30, 100408. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JII.2022.100408

​Rajasekaran, A. S., Azees, M., & Al-Turjman, F. (2022). A comprehensive survey on blockchain technology. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102039

​Verma, M. (2017a). International journal of engineering sciences & research technology working, operation and types of arduino microcontroller. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology Working, 6(6).

​Verma, M. (2017b). Working, Operation and Types of Arduino Microcontroller. © International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, 6(6).

​Xu, Y., Tao, X., Das, M., Kwok, H. H. L., Liu, H., Wang, G., & Cheng, J. C. P. (2023). Suitability analysis of consensus protocols for blockchain-based applications in the construction industry. Automation in Construction, 145, 104638. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUTCON.2022.104638

​Yang, X., Yi, X., Nepal, S., Kelarev, A., & Han, F. (2020). Blockchain voting: Publicly verifiable online voting protocol without trusted tallying authorities. Future Generation Computer Systems, 112, 859–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.06.051

​Yu, F., Lin, H., Wang, X., Yassine, A., & Hossain, M. S. (2022). Blockchain-empowered secure federated learning system: Architecture and applications. Computer Communications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2022.09.008

​Zheng, K., Zheng, L. J., Gauthier, J., Zhou, L., Xu, Y., Behl, A., & Zhang, J. Z. (2022). Blockchain technology for enterprise credit information sharing in supply chain finance. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100256

Published

2022-07-30

How to Cite

Ávila Lucas, J., Pilacuan Bonete, L., & Valenzuela Burbano, K. (2022). DESCRIPTIVE GRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE COVID-19 SITUATION IN ECUADOR. EASI: Engineering and Applied Sciences in Industry, 1(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.53591/easi.v1i1.1768