Perception of forensic Odontologists on the usefulness of palatal Rugoscopy in Ecuador
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Human identification is a fundamental process within forensic sciences, particularly in contexts where traditional identification methods are limited or inconclusive. In this framework, forensic odontology provides complementary techniques such as palatal rugoscopy, which is based on the morphological analysis of palatal rugae due to their individualizing characteristics and relative stability over time. The aim of this study was to analyze the perception of forensic odontologists regarding the usefulness of palatal rugoscopy as a method for human identification in Ecuador. A quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted. The population consisted of seven forensic odontologists, corresponding to the entire identified universe, who completed a structured questionnaire using a Likert-type scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including absolute frequencies and percentages. The results revealed a predominantly favorable perception of palatal rugoscopy, mainly recognized as a complementary method in human identification processes, with agreement levels ranging from 71.4% to 100%. However, the experts also identified significant limitations, such as the lack of technical regulations and standardized protocols, the absence of antemortem records, and gaps in specialized training. It is concluded that palatal rugoscopy has potential forensic value in the Ecuadorian context, provided that standardized protocols, specialized training, and institutional integration within the human identification system are strengthened.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
1. Pretty IA, Sweet D. A look at forensic dentistry--Part 1: The role of teeth in the determination of human identity. Br Dent J. 2001;190(7):359-66. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800972.
2. Kayser M. Forensic DNA phenotyping: Predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2022;59:102679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102679.
3. Gupta AA, Kheur S, Alshehri A, Awadh W, Ahmed ZH, Feroz SMA, Khan SS, Mushtaq S, Dewan H, Khurshid Z, Varadarajan S, Sujatha G, Veeraraghavan VP, Patil S. Is palatal rugae pattern a reliable tool for personal identification following orthodontic treatment? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(2):418. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020418.
4. Santhosh Kumar S, Chacko R, Kaur A, Ibrahim G, Ye D. A systematic review of the use of intraoral scanning for human identification based on palatal morphology. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(5):531. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14050531.
5. Shamim T. The reliability of palatal rugoscopy in forensic identification. Ann Saudi Med. 2013;33(5):513-514. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2013.513.
6. Harchandani N, Marathe S, Rochani R, Ul Nisa S. Palatal rugoscopy: A new era for forensic identification. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2015;27(3):393. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-1363.170469.
7. Navarrete-Quisaguano PL, Jiménez-Villalta J, Grijalva-Mora SN. Odontología forense en América Latina. Sanitas Rev Cienc Salud. 2024;3(Especial Odontología 2):89-95. https://doi.org/10.62574/9fprbf58.
8. Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. 2002;287(2):226-235. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.2.226.
9. Menzala-Peralta CC, Ortega-Menzala E. Evaluación basada en competencias en educación superior. Revista Horizontes. 2023;7(28):836-51. Disponible en: https://revistahorizontes.org/index.php/revistahorizontes/article/view/941
10. Hernández-Sampieri R, Mendoza CP. Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. 7ª ed. Ciudad de México: McGraw-Hill Education; 2018.
11. Joshi A, Kale S, Chandel S, Pal DK. Likert scale: Explored and explained. Br J Appl Sci Technol. 2015;7(4):396-403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975.
12. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(4):373-374. PMID: 11357217.
13. Santhosh Kumar S, Chacko R, Kaur A, Ibrahim G, Ye D. A Systematic Review of the Use of Intraoral Scanning for Human Identification Based on Palatal Morphology. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(5):531. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14050531
14. Garófalo Rosas, Jennifer Solange, & Vallejo Izquierdo, Luis Alberto. Uso de la rugoscopía palatina en Odontología forense según clasificación de Basauri. Revisión literaria. Aula Virtual. 2025; 5(12). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14834551
15. Roselli L, Mele F, Suriano C, Santoro V, Catanesi R, Petruzzi M. Palatal rugae assessment using plaster model and dental scan: a cross-sectional comparative analysis. Front Oral Health. 2024;5:1456377. https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2024.1456377.
16. Farronato M, Begnoni G, Boodt L, Thevissen P, Willems G, Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M. Are palatal rugae reliable markers for 3D superimposition and forensic human identification after palatal expansion? A systematic review. Forensic Sci Int. 2023;351:111814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111814.
17. Gupta AA, Kheur S, Alshehri A, Awadh W, Ahmed ZH, Feroz SMA, Khan SS, Mushtaq S, Dewan H, Khurshid Z, Varadarajan S, Sujatha G, Veeraraghavan VP, Patil S. Is Palatal Rugae Pattern a Reliable Tool for Personal Identification following Orthodontic Treatment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(2):418. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020418.