Evaluation of the pharmacotherapeutic follow-up in patients admitted with high obstetric risk in the University Hospital of Guayaquil

Authors

  • Betsy Fajardo Vélez Universidad de Guayaquil
  • Luis Armando Arias Duque Universidad de Guayaquil
  • Frella Soraya Garcia Larreta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53591/rug.v133i2.1382

Keywords:

Marketing. Pharmacotherapeutic follow-up, drug-related problems, Pharmaceutical Care

Abstract

The use of drugs during pregnancy has become increasingly frequent, this is because during this period various physiological changes occur that could affect pre-existing diseases or induce specific disorders of pregnancy, so it is necessary to promote a Active pharmacovigilance through pharmacotherapeutic monitoring. This document is the result of the research carried out at the Guayaquil University Hospital on patients who were admitted with high obstetric risk in the period from January to June 2021, where the different diagnoses could be classified according to the age range, level of risk and problems related to the medication provided during the hospital stay. The main objective of the research is to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmaceutical care through pharmacotherapeutic follow-up during the period established for the study. The work was carried out through the unit dose dispensing service, using as main instruments: the pharmacotherapeutic profile recorded daily during the stay in the hospitalization service of the patients, the registration of pharmaceutical interventions and the review of medical records. The total of profiles prepared was 144 and the Drug Related Problems(DRP) detected were 82, the most frequent being DRP 1 (54.87%) followed by DRP 5 (15.85%); It was determined that the age range with the highest incidence in terms of obstetric risk is between 25 and 30 years, with 26.38% of the obstetric risks found.

References

Alexakis, P., & Siriopoulos, C. (1999). The international stock market crisis of 1997 and the dynamic relationships between asian stock markets: Linear and nonlinear Granger causality tests. Managerial Finance(25), 22–38.

AMA. (2013). American Marketing Association. Obtenido de Journal of Marketing Reseach: https://www.ama.org/publications/JournalOfMarketing/Pages/Current-Issue.aspx

Andreasen, A. (1994). Social Marketing: Its definition and Domain. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 13(Spring), 108-114.

Arcotel. (2018). Estadísticas Anuales Líneas Móviles. Recuperado el 26 de Enero de 2018, de Agencia de Regulación y Control de Telecomunicaciones: http://www.arcotel.gob.ec/servicio-movil-avanzado-sma/

Barboza, A. (2016). Sobre el Método de la interpretación documental y el uso de las imágines en la sociología. Sociedade e Estado, 21(2), 391-414.

Blodgett, J., Lu, L.-C., & Rose, G. (2001). Ethical Sensitivity to Stakeholder Interest: A Cross-Cultrural Comparison. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 29(2), 190-202.

Claro. (Enero de 2018). Claro. Recuperado el 2 de Febrero de 2018, de Quienes Somos: https://www.claro.com.ec/personas/institucional/quienes-somos/

CNT-EP. (2018). La Corporación Nacional de Telecomunicaciones CNT EP. Recuperado el 2 de Febrero de 2018, de CNT: http://corporativo.cnt.gob.ec/historia-de-las-telecomunicaciones-en-el-ecuador/

Drucker, P. (1984). The new meaning of corporate social responsi-bility. California Management Review, XXVI(2), 53-63.

Gómez, P. (2003). La gestión de marketing de ciudades y áreas metropolitanas: de la orientación al producto a la orientación al marketing. Cuadernos de Gestión, 3(1), 11-25.

Green Paper. (2011). Green Paper on corporate social responsibility. Recuperado el 2018 de Enero de 2018, de Europa: http://europa.eu/legislation

Hunt, S. (1983). General theories and the fundamentalexplananda of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 9-17.

Kotler, P., & Levy, S. (1969). Broading the concept of Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 33(January), 10-15.

Kotler, P., & Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: An approach toplanned social change. Journal of Marketing, 35, 3-12.

Lideres. (Enero de 2014). Revista Lideres. Recuperado el 12 de Enero de 2018, de En 20 años, la telefonía móvil superó las expectativas: http://www.revistalideres.ec/lideres/20-anos-telefonia-movil-supero.html.

Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: an integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 19-23.

Miron, D., Petcu, M., & Sobolevschi, M. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility and sustainable competitiveness. Amfiteatru Economic Journal, A.S.E.(29), 163-180.

Ramos, J., & Periáñez, I. (2003). Delimitación del Marketing con Causa o Marketing Social Corporativo mediante el análisis de empresas que realizan acciones de responsabilidad social. Cuadernos de Gestión, 3(1), 65-82.

Telefónica S.A. (2018). Movistar. Recuperado el 3 de Febrero de 2018, de Historia de Movistar: https://www.movistar.com.ec/

Torres, B. (2006). Metodología de la Investigación. Mexico D.F: Pearson.

Vaaland, T., Heide, M., & Grønhaug, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: investigating theory and research in the marketing context. European Journal of Marketing, (9/10), 927-953.

Vázquez, M. (2011). Investigación en educación matemática: objetivos, cambios, criterios, método y difusión. Education Siglo XXI, 29(2), 173-198.

Vicente, M. Azucena; Mediano, Lucía; . (2002). Propuestas para una segmentación estragégica del mercado ecológico . Cuadernos de Gestión, 2(1).

WBCSD. (2012). World Business Council for Sustainable Development,. Recuperado el 15 de Enero de 2018, de . Corporate social responsibility: Meeting changing expectations [pdf].: http://www.wbcsd.org

Published

2021-01-04

How to Cite

Fajardo Vélez, B., Arias Duque, L. A., & Garcia Larreta, F. S. (2021). Evaluation of the pharmacotherapeutic follow-up in patients admitted with high obstetric risk in the University Hospital of Guayaquil. Revista Universidad De Guayaquil, 132(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.53591/rug.v133i2.1382

Issue

Section

Research Articles