¿Does Contractual Competence Appropriate in the Execution of Execution Titles?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53591/rdc.v4i4.2368Keywords:
Execution titles, Territorial and concurrent Jurisdiction, Inadmissibility of the petition., Appeal, Settling jurisdictionAbstract
Unlike what happens in knowledge or executive processes, where the defendant can propose prior exceptions – among them the incompetence of the judge; In the execution of titles, such as the mortgage, pledge or sale with reservation of ownership, the executed person does not have that possibility. The execution constrains the debtor to oppose only with respect to the causes provided for in the law, as well as the fact that it has occurred after the respective execution title became enforceable, without being allowed to question the jurisdiction of the execution jugde.
For this reason, the work of judges is important, who laminarly; They must qualify their competence to process the execution, and in the event of admitting it to processing, they may be subject to a request for inhibition from another judge to hear said execution, requiring them to decline their competence.
Whether due to inadmissibility of the execution request due to incompetence [if said order is considered appealable], or due to a dispute of jurisdiction, it is up to the Provincial Court of Justice to establish the jurisdiction of the execution judge in cases where there are doubts. who is competent to execute titles such as the mortgage, pledge, or sale with reservation of ownership.
References
Asamblea Nacional de la República del Ecuador. (2015), Código Orgánico General de Procesos, Registro Oficial Suplemento del Registro Oficial No. 506, 22 de mayo 2015. Tercer Suplemento del Registro Oficial 587, 29 de noviembre del 2021
Asamblea Nacional de la República del Ecuador. (2008). Código Orgánico de la Función Judicial, Registro Oficial Suplemento No. 544, 9 de marzo 2009
Asamblea Nacional de la República del Ecuador. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador, Registro Oficial No. 449, 20 de octubre 2008
Congreso Nacional de la República del Perú (1992), Código Procesal Civil de Perú. Decreto Legislativo N° 768, de fecha 4 de marzo de 1992, versión digital
Congreso Nacional de la República del Ecuador (2005), Código Civil del Ecuador, Registro Oficial Suplemento 46. Ecuador, 24 de junio de 2005
Gómez, C. (2012). Teoría General de Proceso. México: Oxford University Press México, S.A. de C.V. versión digital
Corte Constitucional para el período de transición de la República del Ecuador. (2011) Resolución No. 003-11-SCN-CC. CASO No. 0093-10-CN. Juez Constitucional Ponente: Dr. Hernando Morales Vinueza. Quito, D.M., 26 de enero del 2011. www.corteconstitucional.gob.ec
Corte Constitucional de la República del Ecuador. (2020) Sentencia No. 22-13-IN/20. Jueza ponente: Teresa Nuques Martínez. Quito, D.M., 09 de junio de 2020. www.corteconstitucional.gob.ec
Corte Nacional de Justicia de la República del Ecuador. (2017), Resolución No. 06-17, Registro Oficial 983, 12 de abril de 2017. www.cortenacional.gob.ec
Corte Nacional de Justicia de la República del Ecuador. Presidencia. Criterio no Vinculante. Oficio No. 04-CPJC-SP. 29 de enero de 2018. www.cortenacional.gob.ec
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.