Instrucciones para revisores

1. Ethical Commitments and Confidentiality

  • Any manuscript received for review must be treated as a strictly confidential document.

  • Reviewers must not show or discuss the content with third parties, except under express authorization from the Editor.

  • Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

  • Reviews must be conducted objectively, without ideological, epistemic, methodological, or political bias.

2. Conflicts of Interest

  • Reviewers must recuse themselves from the process if they detect conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with authors or institutions related to the document.

  • If a reviewer does not feel qualified to evaluate the research or knows that they will not be able to meet the deadlines, they must immediately notify the Editor.

3. Evaluation Criteria and Deadlines

  • Social-Scientific Quality: Academic rigor and the work's contribution to solving problems in socio-educational and community realities must be evaluated.

  • Deadlines: Evaluators have 30 business days for the first review and 20 business days for the second review following the authors' adjustments.

  • Recognition of Sources: The reviewer must identify relevant works not cited by the authors and alert the editor to any substantial similarity to other published documents.

4. Evaluation Results

Upon completion of the process, the reviewer must issue a reasoned report through the OJS platform, selecting one of these three options:

  1. Publish the article without modifications.

  2. Publish the article with modifications.

  3. Do not publish the article.