Correlación de pruebas diagnósticas ángulo ANB de Angle, valoración Wits y razón A:B en determinación de relación sagital intermaxilar Correlation of diagnostic tests ANB Angle, Wits assessment and A:B ratio in determination of intermaxillary sagital relationship

Contenido principal del artículo

Emily Patricia Icaza Terán
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1617-983X
María Angélica Terreros de Huc
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5761-851X

Resumen

INTRODUCTION: Among the diagnostic tests to evaluate sagittal maxillomandibular skeletal discrepancies and the different changes that occur during growth, the following are presented: ANB angle, (Riedel 1948); the Wits Assessment, (Jacobson 1975) of linear type and the A:B Ratio (Terreros 2020), study of geometric proportions, as alternative diagnostic tests to establish the intermaxillary sagittal relationship. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the correlation of intermaxillary sagittal appreciation between angular diagnostic tests (ANB), linear (WITS) and A:B ratio (geometric proportional) in different facial types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Comparative radiographic study with a quantitative, cross-sectional, retrospective approach in search of 55 cephalometric radiographs of boys and girls aged 8 to 13 years, descriptive-analytical design study, deductive method. RESULTS: In this study it was shown that between the ANB Angle and the A:B Ratio there is a moderate negative relationship of -0.59, between the Wits assessment and the A:B Ratio the correlation is -0.504, which indicates that there is a moderate negative relationship and Angle ANB with the Wits Rating the value is 0.501 which indicates that there is a moderate positive correlation. CONCLUSION: It is established that the ANB angle diagnostic test uses the Nasion point as a reference and that its position affects its diagnosis. There is a moderate to good correlation between the diagnostic tests ANB Angle, A:B Ratio and Wits Assessment in the determination of the intermaxillary sagittal relationship.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
1.
Icaza Terán EP, Terreros de Huc MA. Correlación de pruebas diagnósticas ángulo ANB de Angle, valoración Wits y razón A:B en determinación de relación sagital intermaxilar: Correlation of diagnostic tests ANB Angle, Wits assessment and A:B ratio in determination of intermaxillary sagital relationship. EOUG [Internet]. 27 de enero de 2023 [citado 16 de abril de 2024];6(1):86-98. Disponible en: https://revistas.ug.edu.ec/index.php/eoug/article/view/20
Sección
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
Biografía del autor/a

Emily Patricia Icaza Terán, Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil

Estudiante de la carrera de Odontología de la Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1617-983X

María Angélica Terreros de Huc, Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil

PhD en Odontología. Docente de la Universidad Católica Santiago de Guayaquil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3539-9915

Citas

Juan B. B, Johanna B. PRINCIPALES ANÁLISIS CEFALOMÉTRICOS UTILIZADOS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO ORTODÓNTIC. Revista Científica Odontológica [Internet]. 2006 [cited 18 April 2022];2(1):11-27. Available from: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3242/324227905005.pdf

Hlongwa P. Cephalometric analysis: manual tracing of a lateral cephalogram. South African Dental Journal. 2019;74(7).

Ahmed M, Shaikh A, Fida M. Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2018;23(5):75-81.

Giftson R. 1. Juan B. B, Johanna B. PRINCIPALES ANÁLISIS CEFALOMÉTRICOS UTILIZADOS PARA EL DIAGNÓSTICO ORTODÓNTIC. Revista Científica Odontológica [Internet]. 2006 [cited 18 April 2022];2(1):11-27. Available from: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3242/324227905005.pdf. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research [Internet]. 2017 [cited 18 April 2022];9(2):255-256. Available from: https://www.jpsr.pharmainfo.in/Documents/Volumes/vol9Issue02/jpsr09021739.pdf

Terreros de Huc MA, Bertolotti MC, Mateu ME, Salgado PA. Razón A:B, Prueba Diagnóstica Alternativa al Ángulo ANB en la Determinación de la Relación Sagital Intermaxilar. Revista de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad de Buenos Aires. 2020;35(80):37-49.

Castro Arenas M, Hurtado Peralta M, Oyonarte Weldt R. Rendimiento de la evaluación cefalométrica para el diagnóstico sagital intermaxilar: Revisión narrativa. Revista clínica de periodoncia, implantología y rehabilitación oral. 2013;6(2):99-104.

Elsa Aberer J. Control de Calidad en pruebas cualitativas aplicado a pruebas serológicas. Acta Bioquím Clín Latinoam. 2019;53(4):505-510.

Gómez González C, Pérez Castán J. Capítulo 8: Pruebas diagnósticas. Concordancia. SEMERGEN - Medicina de Familia. 2007;33(10):509-519.

HENS-PÉREZ, M, GONZÁLEZ TORRES V, VILLEGAS RODRIGUEZ I, MAESTRE MARTÍNEZ M, VEGA PÉREZ J, HENS PÉREZ, A et al. La validez operativa de las pruebas de diagnóstico rápido de la meningitis tuberculosa. Revista Medica de Jaén. 2010;:24-28.

Kumar R. Evaluation of diagnostic tests. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2015;4(2):76-79.

FordScott M, Springman R. Complications in Anesthesia (Second Edition). Chapter 36 - Preanesthetic Evaluation: False-Positive Tests. 2007;:141-143.

Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte L. Correlation Coefficients. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2018;126(5):1763-1768.

Terreros Caicedo M, Bertolotti M, Mateu M. Diagnóstico cefalométrico de la relación sagital intermaxilar. Pruebas diagnósticas lineales en relación al ángulo ANB. Estudio de resultados parciales. Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Buenos Aires. 2017;32(73):49-56.

Jan, A., Bangash, A., & Shinwari, S. (2017). THE CORRELATION BETWEEN WITS AND ANB CEPHALOMETRIC LANDMARKS IN ORTHODONTIC PATEINTS. PAFMJ, 67(Suppl-3), S267-71. Retrieved from https://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/4573

Aldrees AM A. ANB, Wits And Molar Relationship, Do They Correlate In Orthodontic Patients?. Dentistry. 2014;04(06).

Cossio L, López J, Rueda Z, Botero-Mariaca P. Morphological configuration of the cranial base among children aged 8 to 12 years. BMC Research Notes. 2016;9(1).

Aldrees AM A. ANB, Wits And Molar Relationship, Do They Correlate In Orthodontic Patients?. Dentistry. 2014;04(06).

Oyonarte R, Hurtado M, Castro M. Evolution of ANB and SN-GoGn angles during craniofacial growth: A retrospective longitudinal study. APOS Trends in Orthodontics. 2016;6:295-301.

Buschang P, Jacob H. Mandibular rotation revisited: What makes it so important?. Seminars in Orthodontics. 2014;20(4):299-315.

Subramaniam P, Naidu P. Mandibular dimensional changes and skeletal maturity. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2010;1(4):218-222.

Gong A, Li J, Wang Z, Li Y, Hu F, Li Q et al. Cranial base characteristics in anteroposterior malocclusions: A meta-analysis. The Angle Orthodontist. 2015;86(4):668-680.

Jacobson A. The “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2003;124(5):470-479.

Terreros de Huc, MA. ; Bertolotti, MC. ; Mateu, ME. ; et al. (2020). Razón A:B, Prueba Diagnóstica Alternativa al Ángulo ANB en la Determinación de la Relación Sagital Intermaxilar Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Odontología. Available from: http://odontologia.uba.ar/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/art5_vol35_80.pdf

Bhullar M, Thakur A, Mittal S, Aggarwal I, Palkit T, Goyal M. Evaluation and Correlation of Beta Angle with Wits Appraisal and ANB Angle in Various Skeletal Malocclusion Groups—A Cephalometric Study. Dental Journal of Advance Studies. 2021;9(02):96-100.

Aparna P, Kumar DN, Prasad M, et al. Comparative assessment of sagittal skeletal discrepancy: a cephalometric study. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9(4):ZC38–ZC4

Zamora N, Cibrian R, Gandia J, Paredes V. Study between anb angle and Wits appraisal in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal. 2013;:e725-e732.

Bishara S, Fahl J, Peterson L. Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: Clinical implications. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1983;84(2):133-139.

Silwal S, Shrestha R, Pyakurel U, Bhandari S. Cephalometric Comparison of Wits Appraisal and APP-BPP to the ANB Angle. Orthodontic Journal of Nepal. 2020;10(1):40-