ORIGINAL
RESEARCH
Relationship
between partial edentulism and quality of life in adults with prostheses
Relación del edentulismo
parcial con la calidad de vida en adultos portadores de prótesis
Juan José Christiani 1. Paola Olivera 2. Natalia Rosende 3. Ricardo Hugo Altamirano 4
1 Doctor of Dentistry.
Universidad Nacional del Nordeste. Argentina. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8627-9174
2 Doctor of Dentistry. Universidad
Nacional del Nordeste. Argentina. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0175-9919
3 Master’s Degree in Health Sciences Research. Universidad
Nacional del Nordeste. Argentina. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2843-130X
4 Doctor of Dentistry.
Universidad Nacional del Nordeste. Argentina. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5418-4747
Correspondence: jjchristiani@odn.unne.edu.ar
Received: 29/04/2026 Accepted: 28/06/2026
ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the relationship between
partial edentulism and oral health-related quality of life in adults with
removable partial dentures. Materials and methods: An observational and
descriptive study was conducted on 40 patients at the Rehabilitation Clinic
Module of the Faculty of Dentistry at the National University of the Northeast,
Argentina. Age, sex, and type of edentulism according to the Kennedy
classification were recorded, and oral health-related quality of life was
assessed using the GOHAI index. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics
and non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis and Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner). Results: The average age was 51 years, and
females predominated (63%). Kennedy Class III was the most frequent
classification (32.5%) and presented the highest average GOHAI score (55.3 ±
3.8), while Class I showed the lowest (48.2 ± 4.5). Forty-two percent of
participants reported a moderate self-perception of their oral health-related
quality of life, while 33% reported a poor perception. Significant differences
were found between Kennedy classifications (p=0.044), particularly between
classes II and III (p=0.039). Conclusions: Partial edentulism influences the
quality of life of adults wearing removable dentures, with better results
observed in cases with greater prosthetic stability. Comprehensive evaluation
and regular follow-up are essential to optimize rehabilitation and patient
well-being.
Keywords: Edentulism; Removable partial dentures;
Quality of life; Oral health; Oral rehabilitation.
RESUMEN
Objetivo:
Evaluar la relación entre el edentulismo parcial y la
calidad de vida relacionada con la salud oral en adultos portadores de prótesis
parciales removibles. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio
observacional y descriptivo en 40 pacientes en el Módulo de Clínica
Rehabilitadora de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad Nacional del
Nordeste, Argentina. Se registraron edad, sexo y tipo de edentulismo
según la clasificación de Kennedy, y la calidad de vida relacionada con la
salud oral se evaluó mediante el índice GOHAI. Los datos se analizaron con
estadística descriptiva y pruebas no paramétricas (Kruskal-Wallis y Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner). Resultados: La edad promedio fue de
51 años y predominó el sexo femenino (63%). La clase III de Kennedy fue la más
frecuente (32,5%) y presentó el mayor puntaje promedio de GOHAI (55,3±3,8),
mientras que la clase I mostró el menor (48,2±4,5). El 42% de los participantes
presentó una autopercepción moderada de su calidad de vida relacionada con la
salud oral y el 33% una percepción pobre. Se encontraron diferencias
significativas entre las clases de Kennedy (p=0,044), particularmente entre las
clases II y III (p=0,039). Conclusiones: El edentulismo
parcial influye en la calidad de vida de los adultos portadores de prótesis
removibles, observándose mejores resultados en los casos con mayor estabilidad
protésica. La evaluación integral y el seguimiento periódico son fundamentales
para optimizar la rehabilitación y el bienestar de los pacientes.
Palabras clave: Edentulismo;
Prótesis parcial removible; Calidad de vida; Salud bucal; Rehabilitación bucal.
INTRODUCTION
Edentulism constitutes an
important oral health indicator and is defined as the complete or partial
absence of teeth, whether due to congenital or acquired causes. In the case of
partial edentulism, tooth loss is limited to a specific number of teeth, allowing
individuals to adapt through the placement of artificial teeth in the
edentulous spaces. In contrast, complete edentulism is characterized by the
total absence of the permanent dentition (1).
Partial tooth loss can be
rehabilitated using removable partial dentures (RPDs), which functionally and
aesthetically replace missing teeth. These prostheses are characterized by
their lightness, flexibility, retention through coverage of gingival tissues,
and reduced need for extensive preprosthetic
preparation. They are also more affordable than fixed prostheses or dental
implants (2).
Edentulism not only affects
masticatory function and phonation but also has a negative impact on general
health and quality of life. Tooth loss has been associated with nutritional
changes, decreased enjoyment of food, and psychological alterations such as low
self-esteem, embarrassment, and reduced social interaction (3,4). These effects
occur across different dimensions: psychological and social, affecting
self-esteem and interpersonal interaction; biological, including maxillary bone
resorption and joint alterations; and physiological, by making bolus formation
more difficult and limiting the intake of foods with greater consistency (5,6).
When partial tooth loss
occurs, the missing teeth can be replaced with a removable partial denture
(RPD), which partially restores the dentition and is characterized by
flexibility, retention through coverage of gingival tissues, low weight,
improved aesthetics through the elimination of visible clasps, and relatively
less demanding preprosthetic planning and
preparation. RPDs are also more economical than fixed prostheses or
implant-supported restorations.
Edentulism can
substantially compromise oral and general health, as well as quality of life,
including enjoyment of food and nutritional status. A specific association has
been demonstrated between tooth loss and increasing age, as well as the fact
that some teeth are retained for longer periods than others.
The absence of teeth may
lead to functional alterations affecting speech and mastication and may
negatively impact quality of life.
Health-related quality of
life (HRQoL) is a concept that integrates
individuals' perceptions of their overall well-being and health status,
encompassing both objective and subjective aspects. In the context of oral
health, instruments such as the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI)
allow the assessment of functional, psychosocial, and pain-related dimensions
associated with tooth loss and prosthesis use (7,8). Available
evidence indicates that the appropriate use of removable dentures improves masticatory
function, aesthetics, and harmony of the stomatognathic system, positively
influencing patients' perception of well-being (9,10).
Recent studies conducted in
Cuba, Peru, and Ecuador have demonstrated that prosthetic rehabilitation in
older adults produces significant improvements in quality of life, particularly
in psychosocial and functional dimensions. However, a considerable proportion
of the population still reports a low self-perception of their oral health,
reflecting the need for more personalized interventions and continuous clinical
follow-up (11,12).
The objective of this study
was to evaluate the relationship between partial edentulism and quality of life
in adults wearing removable dentures by comparing GOHAI scores according to the
Kennedy classification.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An observational,
descriptive study was conducted. The study population consisted of 130 patients
who attended the Rehabilitative Dentistry Clinic Module of the Faculty of
Dentistry at Universidad Nacional del Nordeste
(UNNE), Argentina, during the study period. A non-probability convenience
sampling method was used to select a sample of 40 patients who met the
established inclusion and exclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the
study. The unit of analysis was each patient included in the study.
Inclusion criteria:
Patients with partial tooth loss, patients wearing removable dentures, adults
over 40 years of age, and patients who provided informed consent to participate
in the study.
Exclusion criteria: Older
adults with cognitive difficulties that prevented them from adequately
answering the questions and immunosuppressed patients.
All participants signed an
informed consent form approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Faculty of
Dentistry of Universidad Nacional del Nordeste
(FOUNNE), ensuring the confidentiality of individual data. The following
variables were considered: age, sex, and type of partial edentulism, according
to the Kennedy classification:
·
Class
I: Bilateral posterior edentulous areas.
·
Class
II: Unilateral posterior edentulous areas.
·
Class
III: Unilateral edentulous areas with a posterior abutment.
·
Class
IV: Single edentulous areas crossing the midline.
To assess self-perceived
oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), the
Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) questionnaire, validated for
this type of study, was used.
The data were recorded in a
database and analyzed using InfoStat software.
Descriptive statistics were performed, and the Kruskal–Wallis
test was used to compare GOHAI scores among the Kennedy classes, complemented
by the Dwass–Steel–Critchlow–Fligner
post hoc test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Table 1.
Distribution of the sample according to sex, age, and Kennedy classification
|
Kennedy Class |
Women |
Men |
Total |
Mean Age (years) |
|
I |
6 |
3 |
9 |
53 |
|
II |
7 |
4 |
11 |
50 |
|
III |
8 |
5 |
13 |
52 |
|
IV |
4 |
3 |
7 |
49 |
|
Total |
25 |
15 |
40 |
51 |
The distribution of the
sample (Table 1) showed a predominance of female patients (63%) over male
patients (37%), with a mean age of 51 years. Kennedy Class III edentulism was
the most frequent (32.5%), followed by Class II (27.5%), Class I (22.5%), and
Class IV (17.5%). Patients with Class I edentulism were slightly older (53
years), whereas those with Class IV were younger (49 years). This distribution
allows comparison of oral quality of life according to sex and type of
edentulism based on Kennedy classification.
Table 2. GOHAI
scores according to Kennedy classification
|
Kennedy Class |
Mean GOHAI |
Standard Deviation |
|
I |
48.2 |
4.5 |
|
II |
50.7 |
5.1 |
|
III |
55.3 |
3.8 |
|
IV |
51.4 |
4.2 |
The mean GOHAI scores
(Table 2) showed that Class III achieved the highest score (55.3 ± 3.8),
indicating a better perception of oral quality of life, probably due to greater
prosthetic stability and functional retention in unilateral edentulous areas with
a posterior abutment. Class I obtained the lowest score (48.2 ± 4.5),
indicating greater functional difficulties and lower aesthetic satisfaction
among patients with bilateral posterior edentulous areas.
Classes II (50.7 ± 5.1) and
IV (51.4 ± 4.2) presented intermediate values, demonstrating that the extent
and location of edentulism influence OHRQoL. In this
regard, the greater the functionality and stability of the prosthesis, the more
positive the perception of oral quality of life among adults wearing removable
dentures.
Table 3.
Distribution of self-perceived oral health-related quality of life
|
OHRQoL
Level |
n |
Percentage |
|
Satisfactory |
10 |
25% |
|
Moderate |
17 |
42% |
|
Poor |
13 |
33% |
Self-perceived OHRQoL showed that 42% of participants presented a moderate
level, whereas only 25% reported a satisfactory perception, as shown in Table
3.
The Kruskal–Wallis test was applied to compare oral quality-of-life
scores among the different Kennedy classes, revealing statistically significant
differences (χ²
= 8.08, df = 3, p = 0.044). Post hoc analysis using
the Dwass–Steel–Critchlow–Fligner
test identified significant differences between Class II and Class III (p =
0.039).
DISCUSSION
Regarding age, most
participants had a mean age of 51 years. These findings are similar to those
reported by Rodríguez M (13) and Ilhan et al. (14), in
which most patients were younger than 60 years. This differs from other
studies, such as those by Jiménez Quintana (15)
and Zambrano Guarnizo (16), as well as
other investigations in which most participants were 60 years of age or older.
The General Oral Health
Assessment Index (GOHAI) was used to evaluate oral health-related quality of
life. According to this index, most patients presented moderate to poor oral
health-related quality of life. These results are similar to those reported by
Ramos Arce (11), who found that 99.1% of the population had low
self-perception, as well as to the study by Martínez (17), in which
quality of life was negatively affected in 67.7% of participants. Similarly, Pretel I (18) reported that most adults had a moderate
quality of life, with the highest proportion reaching 50.27%. Saliba et al. (19),
in turn, reported that oral health in their study groups had a “low” impact on
the quality of life of older adults.
These findings are similar
to those of other studies (20), which demonstrated that removable
partial dentures achieved functional and aesthetic satisfaction rates ranging
from 90% to 95%. Velázquez Ponce et al. (21) found that complete
removable dentures improved the quality of life of edentulous patients by 65%.
Oral health-related quality
of life (OHRQoL) in adults with partial edentulism
wearing removable dentures is influenced by functional, aesthetic, and
psychosocial factors. Several studies have demonstrated that patients with
Kennedy Class I partial edentulism who use removable dentures present poorer
outcomes in oral hygiene, occlusal force, masticatory function, and perception
of oral frailty compared with those rehabilitated with implant-supported fixed
prostheses. This is reflected in higher scores, indicating poorer oral quality
of life (13–17).
Although removable dentures
produce an initial improvement in perceived quality of life, this improvement
is not always maintained over the long term. A recent meta-analysis
demonstrated that the benefits are maintained during the first six months,
whereas evidence at 12 months remains limited, suggesting the need for periodic
follow-up and prosthetic adjustments to prolong functionality (18,19).
However, other studies,
such as that by Aguilar et al. (22), concluded that participants did
not report their quality of life as being negatively affected by the use of
dental prostheses. Cano Gutiérrez et al. (23)
reported that edentulism significantly affects quality of life among older
adults, but the use of dental prostheses does not necessarily improve quality
of life, possibly due to insufficient knowledge regarding their proper use.
These findings demonstrate
that the choice of rehabilitation modality should be individualized, taking
into consideration both functional needs and each patient's expectations.
Furthermore, the integration of more advanced technologies, such as implant-supported
fixed prostheses, appears to be an option associated with better medium- and
long-term outcomes in terms of quality of life and functionality.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings of the present
study show that the perception of oral quality of life among adults with
partial edentulism who wear removable dentures tends to be moderate or
unsatisfactory. This is consistent with international evidence indicating that,
although these prostheses improve function and aesthetics in the short term,
their positive impact decreases over time, particularly in the absence of
regular follow-up and prosthetic adjustments.
The incorporation of
implants as support for removable prostheses or the transition to fixed
rehabilitations can significantly improve masticatory function, stability, and
the perception of well-being, although more comprehensive follow-up is required
to prevent biomechanical or biological complications.
It is essential to consider
the patient's perspective from the planning stage of rehabilitation,
prioritizing treatment options that optimize not only function and aesthetics
but also comfort and treatment longevity, while simultaneously promoting adherence
to prosthesis use and appropriate maintenance.
REFERENCES
1.
Ramírez A,
Aristizábal M, López, A, Ospina Y, Peña K. Calidad de vida relacionada con la
salud bucal del adulto mayor rehabilitado con prótesis total. Cultura del
cuidado, 2020:17(2), 23-34.
2.
Ali Z, Baker SR, Shahrbaf
S, Martin N, Vettore MV. Oral health-related quality
of life after prosthodontic treatment for patients with partial edentulism: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(1):59-68.e3.
3.
Yasuda N, Kimura
Y, Wada M, Takayama Y, Tanaka T, Ohno K, et al. Impact of removable partial
dentures on oral health-related quality of life in patients with shortened
dental arches: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(11):6657-6673.
4.
Fuentes M,
Peña Y, López I. Autopercepción de salud bucal en adultos mayores portadores de
prótesis estomatológica. Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas, 2016:15(1),
51-63.
5.
Bandiaky, ON , Lokossou, DL , Soueidan, A. , Le Bars, P. , Gueye, M. , Mbodj, EB y Le Guéhennec, L. Prótesis parciales removibles soportadas por implantes en
comparación con prótesis convencionales: una revisión sistemática y
metaanálisis de la calidad de vida, la satisfacción del paciente y las
complicaciones biomecánicas . Clinical and
Experimental Dental Research , 2022:8 , 294–312 . https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.521
6.
Bilhan H, Kutay
O, Kocaagaoglu H, Bilgin T.
Biomechanical and biological complications of implant-supported removable
partial dentures: a systematic review. J Prosthodont.
2021;30(7):582-591.
7.
Gondo R, Yamamoto
T, Fujiwara Y, Takahashi M, Furuta
M, Nakagawa T, et al. Long-term use and discontinuation of removable
partial dentures: a longitudinal cohort study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24:114.
8.
Yamamoto T, Fujiwara Y, Furuta M, Takeuchi K,
Naito T, Goto M, et al. Oral health-related quality
of life and reasons for discontinuing removable partial denture use. Gerodontology. 2023;40(2):123-130.
9.
Navarro-Pardo E, Tomás-Navarro C, Bravo M,
Gil-Montoya JA. Validation of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index
(GOHAI) in institutionalized elderly in Spain. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol.
2020;48(3):221-227.
10.
Yamamoto T, Furuta M,
Takeuchi K, Adachi M, Hori Y, Takebayashi T, et al.
Oral health status and GOHAI scores among institutionalized older adults. Gerodontology. 2021;38(1):30-37.
11.
Rios-López A, Alcantara Chavez D.
"Percepción de la calidad de vida y satisfacción en pacientes portadores
de dentadura parcial removible: Revisión de Literatura Sistematizada."
Odontología Vital 40 (2024): 42-51.
12.
Fernández G, Caldas W, Ribeiro FC, Pereira AL, Leles CR. Long-term satisfaction with
fixed and removable partial dentures: a prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(6):2345-2352.
13. Rodríguez Fuentes M, Peña YA, Herrera López I. Autopercepción de
salud bucal en adultos mayores portadores de prótesis estomatológica. Revista
Habanera de Ciencias Médicas 2016; 15(1):51-63
14.
İlhan B, Çal E, Dündar N, Güneri
P, Dağhan Ş. Oral health-related quality of life
among institutionalized patients after dental rehabilitation. Geriatr GerontolInt. 2015; 15
(10): 1151–1157. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12413.
15.
Jiménez Quintana Z, Grau León IB, Maresma Frómeta R, Díaz Justo M, Terry Pérez E. Impacto de la rehabilitación
protésica en la calidad de vida relacionada con salud bucal en adultos mayores.
MediSur. 2021;19(1):115-122. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi
16.
Zambrano
Guarnizo KM. Factores asociados al cambio de prótesis removibles en pacientes
atendidos en clínica UCSG semestre B-2019 [tesis de pregrado en Internet].
Guayaquil (EC): Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil; 2020 [citado
2026 Jun 19]. Disponible en: https://repositorio.ucsg.edu.ec/bitstream/3317/14259/1/T-UCSG-PRE-MED-ODON-520.pdf
17.
Martínez
T. Calidad de vida en el Edentulismo Total.
Universidad Central del Ecuador. [Internet]. 2017 [citado 5 de octubre de
2018]; Disponible en: http://www.dspace.uce.edu.ec/handle/25000/9485
18.
Valenzuela-Ramos
M et al. "Factores asociados al nivel de conocimiento de la población
sobre el uso, cuidado e higiene en pacientes portadores de Prótesis Dentales
Removibles." Avances en Odontoestomatología
2022:38.4:137-142.
19.
Saliba T., Ortega M., Goya K., Moimaz S., Garbin C. Influence of
oral health on the quality of life of institutionalized and non-institutionalized elderly people.
Dent. Res. J. (Isfahan). 2018; 15 (4):256-63
20. Larco, M, Larco, S, Ibarra, M, Rosero, K. Calidad de vida relacionada a salud oral y
general en edéntulos totales rehabilitados con prótesis totales mucosoportadas e implantosoportadas. Quito. Metro
Ciencia, 2023:31(1), 14-22.
21.
Velásquez Ponce L, Gallardo Bastidas, J. C. (2018). Calidad de vida
relacionada a salud oral en pacientes portadores de prótesis total. Clínica UCSG 2014. Revista Conrado, 14(61),
161-164. Recuperado de http://conrado.ucf.
edu.cu/index.php/Conrado.
22. Aguilar A, Avendaño A, Parrillo A,
Vergara A, Salazar A, Durán S. Calidad
de vida en adultos mayores portadores de prótesis dental de la comunidad Mucuy
Baja, Mérida, Venezuela- RevVenezInvestOdont IADR,
2017; 5(2): 195-203.
23. Cano-Gutiérrez C, Borda MG, Arciniegas AJ, Borda CX. Edentulism and dental prostheses in the
elderly: impact on quality of life measured with the EuroQol
Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS). Rev Estomatol.
2015;28(2):149-55.
DECLARATION OF
CONTRIBUTIONS
“Conceptualization and
study design: Christiani Juan José, Altamirano
Ricardo; Literature review: Olivera Paola, Altamirano Ricardo; Methodology and
validation: Christiani Juan José, Altamirano Ricardo;
Formal analysis: Christiani Juan José, Olivera Paola;
Investigation and data collection: Altamirano Ricardo, Rosende
María Natalia, Christiani Juan José; Resources:
Altamirano Ricardo; Data analysis and interpretation: Christiani
Juan José, Altamirano Ricardo; Writing—original draft preparation: Altamirano
Ricardo, Rosende María Natalia; Writing—review and
editing: Christiani Juan José, Altamirano Ricardo;
Supervision: Olivera Paola, Rosende María Natalia,
Altamirano Ricardo; Project administration: Christiani
Juan José, Altamirano Ricardo; Funding acquisition: Not applicable.”
CONFLICTS OF
INTEREST
The authors declare that
there were no conflicts of interest during the conduct of the research. The
manuscript was submitted exclusively to the Scientific Journal “Especialidades Odontológicas UG”
for review and publication.
FUNDING
The authors declare that
the research was conducted using their own funds.
COPYRIGHT
This is an open-access article
distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC
BY-NC-ND) License. Its use, distribution, or reproduction in other media is
permitted, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s)
and copyright holder, and that the original publication in this journal is
cited in accordance with accepted academic practices. Any use, distribution, or
reproduction that does not comply with these terms is prohibited.
HOW TO CITE:
Christiani JJ, Olivera P, Rosende N,
Altamirano RH. Relationship between partial edentulism and quality of life in
adults wearing dentures. Revista Científica Especialidades
Odontológicas UG. 2026;9(2):9–14.