Revista Conexiones UG, Vol. 4, No. 1, January - June 2026
e-ISSN: 2960-8147 ISBN: 978-9942-44-827-9
Introduction
Taking into account the intricate context of the redefinition of power and the immoral concentration
of wealth among certain individuals, in contradiction with an expansion and spread of poverty and, with it,
hunger, as a consideration of the secular individual-society dilemma, always trusting in the expectations of
a well-being that never arrives, perpetually evocative of great human sensitivity—it is for this reason that
this minority group, composed of girls, boys, and adolescents, needs the necessary assistance to escape or
change this situation. And if such assistance is not provided appropriately, this societal group will not ‘learn to
fish while being given the fish,’ which will, paradoxically, lead them to remain poor.
From this perspective, economic misfortune and insufficiency must be approached from a myriad of
coincidences or as an emotional disorder that can cause psychosocial failure or decline marked by deprivation,
as a result of the cause-effect relationship. Therefore, it must be considered a multidisciplinary and complex
circumstance from the moment the process of impoverishment begins until, through certain procedures, it
is transformed through the evolution, progress, and development of the groups involved in this economic
situation. Otherwise, these societal collectives will remain in the same situation indefinitely, excluded from the
trappings of progress, from the erosion of institutional frameworks to the fragmentation of the social fabric
and the influence of external factors. Hence, according to Guerra Velásquez (2009:143), who states: ‘Numerous
are the evaluations and discussions that include historical, economic, cultural, and social analyses among the
causes of poverty in the world.
This situation, which leaves very little to address the sectoral needs of its immense demand, increases
the number of ‘boys and girls of and on the street’ as future unemployed individuals, thus perpetuating the
culture of hunger and, with it, life in unhealthy, disorderly shantytowns—yet marked by complexity and chaos—
simultaneously plagued by major disruptions in their changing reality, subject to the contingencies of time
and space in which ‘one lives,’ and further enveloped in uncertainties and dreams of changes concerning the
inequalities and differences that arouse the fears awakened by their altruistic side.
These stereotypes have reached proportions insufficiently addressed by the social sciences. Therefore,
each governmental system, with the expediency that circumstances demand, must assume the inescapable
commitment to promote concrete political actions to combat hunger and extreme poverty in this part of the
continent—one as a consequence of the other—and to consolidate comprehensive educational, economic,
and health systems that include and incorporate these individuals into a genuine democratic system of
freedom, so that they may have a future different from the dark present they are currently experiencing.
It is public and well-known that these individuals who survive under conditions of extreme poverty, yet
seek a formulation to build an identity based on facts of which there are thousands of pieces of evidence in this
part of the continent—where it is noted that they sleep on cardboard boxes that the night provides them—
have no hope that their situation will change, nor do they have confidence in themselves or in the authorities
to change it, thereby becoming a harsh, undeniable, and unavoidable reality. This leads to one of the most
dramatic situations in Latin America: ‘boys and girls of and on the street.’
These minors in situations of extreme poverty do not have a suitable place to spend the night; and
if they do, it is an unhealthy shantytown lacking the necessary means of coexistence that the complexity,
multidimensionality, and decline of reality demand. Consequently, they spend their lives on the street searching
for sustenance, even if it comes from garbage. Because most have broken their family ties or these ties are very
weak, they develop street survival strategies such as begging and certain marginal ‘jobs’ like ‘watching cars’ or
selling some product in the informal economy—without this improving their conditions to enrich their reality
or constructing a perspective of ‘family’ integration.
64