Revista Conexiones UG, Vol. 4, No. 1, January - June 2026
e-ISSN: 2960-8147 ISBN: 978-9942-44-827-9
For instance, a student with ADHD may exhibit what can be described, in Deleuzian terms, as rhizomatic
cognition—an ability to establish transversal connections across disciplinary domains. At the same time, such
learners may benefit from temporal and structural scaffolding to sustain executive attention (Jordán & Vergara,
2020). Similarly, autistic students often demonstrate a remarkable hermeneutic capacity to decode complex
systems and abstract patterns; however, they may experience uncoded social interactions as disruptive semiotic
interference. Consequently, their development is better supported through predictable environments and
visual supports that function as cognitive-social prostheses (Lobos et al., 2024).
The social model of disability, reinterpreted through the lens of liberation philosophy proposed by
Enrique Dussel (2011), shifts the focus from the “remediation” of the student toward a decolonial redesign
of the educational ecosystem. Within this framework, pedagogical tools, pathways, and structures must be
configured to enable a plurality of cognitive styles to flourish and co-construct knowledge, in line with the
principles of the pedagogy of autonomy advanced by Paulo Freire (1997).
This perspective also resonates with the epistemologies of the South articulated by Boaventura de
Sousa Santos (2010), which recognize the value of subaltern knowledges and diverse forms of embodied
consciousness. From this standpoint, neurodiversity is not framed as a limitation, but rather as a condition of
possibility for educational innovation, particularly within a Latin American perspective.
Methods
This study adopts a theoretical–philosophical hermeneutic approach as its central method, aimed
at uncovering the deeper meanings and conceptual structures underlying neurodivergent inclusion in the
university context. Rather than limiting itself to a conventional literature review, this approach advances
toward a dialectical interpretation that connects the analyzed theoretical frameworks with lived educational
experience. It is situated within the research line Integrative and Inclusive Educational Strategies from a Trans-
complex Perspective.
Transcomplexity, understood as an epistemological horizon, enables the study to move beyond
fragmented views of knowledge and to conceive education as a dynamic, interdependent system in constant
reconfiguration. From this standpoint, the research does not seek linear answers; instead, it aims to weave
meaningful relationships among neurodiversity, the STEAM approach, and the use of comics as tools for
cognitive and affective mediation.
The hermeneutic process was carried out in three interrelated phases:
1. Contextual immersion phase: A comprehensive review of specialized literature was conducted,
focusing on neuroeducation, inclusive pedagogies, STEAM education, and visual narratives, with
particular attention to the Latin American context. This phase enabled the identification of key
tensions, gaps, and potentialities in the theoretical and practical articulation of neurodivergent
inclusion.
2. Relational interpretation phase: Through an emergent categorical analysis, connections were
established among authors, pedagogical approaches, and documented experiences. The aim
was not merely comparative, but interpretive—building conceptual bridges that deepen the
understanding of the educational phenomenon under study.
3. Transcomplex synthesis phase: The partial interpretations were integrated into a coherent and
theoretically grounded proposal, in which the metaphor of the “Knowledge Universe” operates as
an integrative meta-model capable of embracing the diversity of voices, knowledges, and cognitive
modalities present in the university classroom.
24