La huella ecológica de los perros y gatos de compañía
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53591/cna.v16i2.1870Palabras clave:
HEA, GEI, ambiente, animales, mascotas, GuayaquilResumen
Como indicador de desarrollo sostenible, la huella ecológica ha logrado proporcionar una base
para discutir los impactos ambientales del consumo humano. Los seres humanos son el origen de
numerosas actividades contaminantes en la Tierra y son los principales impulsores del cambio
climático. Sin embargo, se han realizado muy pocas investigaciones sobre los impactos ambientales
de los animales, especialmente los animales domésticos, como perros y gatos, quienes necesitan
cantidades significativas de comida para mantener sus necesidades energéticas diarias. Por lo
tanto, la huella ecológica animal (HEA) dietética podría servir como un indicador útil para evaluar
los impactos de las mascotas en el medio ambiente. En el presente artículo, explicamos el impacto
ambiental de los perros y gatos de compañía cuantificando su HEA y las emisiones de gases de
efecto invernadero (GEI) de acuerdo con los datos primarios recopilados en los tres distritos de
la ciudad Guayaquil en coordinación con la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia de la
Universidad de Guayaquil y de la Unidad de Bienestar Animal de la Alcaldía de Guayaquil; los
resultados muestran que la HEA dietética de perros y gatos de compañía con comida seca comercial
en el distrito 3 o en el distrito 1 era aproximadamente dos veces mayor que el de los distrito 2.
Se concluye que la mayoría de los perros y gatos de compañía en los distritos 1, 2 y 3 de Guayaquil
consumen más energía de la que realmente necesitan para mantener una actividad normal, lo que
afecta en las emisiones de GEI y la HEA de la dieta
Citas
AC., B. (March de 2015). Obtenido de Creature Companion:
https://creature-companions.in/
AJ., G. (2006). The growing problem of obesity in dogs and
cats. Journal of Nutrition(136), 1940S–1946S.
Amiot C, B. B. (2016). People and companion animals: It takes
two to tango. BioScience(66), 552–560.
Bermingham EN, T. D. (2010). Energy requirements of adult
cats. British Journal of Nutrition(103), 1083–1093.
Bermingham EN, T. D. (2014). Energy requirements of adult
dogs: A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE(9).
Beverland MB, F. F. (2008). Exploring the dark side of pet
ownership: Status-and control-based pet consumption.
Journal of Business Research(61), 490–496.
C., W.-D. (2009). Dogs vs. SUVs. Recuperado el Noviembre
de 2020, de Sightline Institute: www.sightline.
org/2009/11/02/dogs-vs-cars
Collier R, B. D. (1982). Influences of environment and its
modification on dairy animal health and production.
Journal of Dairy Science(65), 2213–2227.
CP., F. (2000). Battered women and their animal companions:
Symbolic interaction between human and nonhuman
animals. Society and Animals(8), 99–127.
Csutora M, M. Z. (2009). Sustainable consumption: From
escape strategies towards real alternatives. Sustainable
Consumption Conference. Sustainable Consumption,
Production, and Communication.
Cutt H, G.-C. B. (2007). Dog ownership, health and physical
activity: A critical review of the literature. Health and
Place(13), 261–272.
D., H. (1995). Animal welfare: The consumer and the food
industry. British Food Journal(97), 3–7.
Durk Nijdam, T. R. (2012). The price of protein: Review of
land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments
of animal food products and their substitutes. Food
Policy, 37(6), 760-770. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
foodpol.2012.08.002.
Fleeman LM, O. E. (2007). Animal Physiotherapy: Assessment,
Treatment and Rehabilitation of Animals. (G. L. McGowan
C, Ed.) Applied animal nutrition, 14–31.
Fowler V, F. M. (2013). Energy requirements for the growing
pig. Energy Metabolism: Proceedings of the Eighth
Symposium of the European Association of Animal
Production., 151–156 in Mount LE.
Fu W, T. J. (2015). Ecological footprint (EF): An expanded
role in calculating resource productivity (RP) using China
and the G20 member countries as examples. Ecological
Indicators(48), 464–471.
GS., O. (2017). Environmental impacts of food consumption
by dogs and cats. PLOS ONE(12).
Hammerly T, D. B. (2012). The environmental impact of pets.
Green Teacher(95), 25-28.
K., R. (2009). How green is your pet? New Scientist(204),
–47.
Knight A, L. M. (2016). Vegetarian versus meat-based diets for
companion animals. Animals(6), 57.
L., P. (November de 2009). How big is a dog’s eco-pawprint?
Audobon. Obtenido de www.audubon.org/news/how-bigdogs-
eco-pawprint
L., S. (November de 2014). The surprisingly large carbon paw
print of your beloved pet. Salon. Obtenido de www.salon.
com/2014/11/20/the_surprisingly_large_carbon_paw_
print_of_your_beloved_pet_partner
Leenstra F, V. T. (2011). Indication of the ecological foot print
of companion animals: First survey, focussed on cats, dogs
and horses in the Netherlands. Wageningen UR Livestock
Research.(Report no 410650).
Linder DE, F. L. (2010). Evaluation of calorie density and
feeding directions for commercially available diets
designed for weight loss in dogs and cats. Journal of the
American Veterinary Medical Association(236), 74–77.
M.I. Municipalidad de Guayaquil. (2022). Recuperado el
mayo de 2022, de M.I. Municipalidad de Guayaquil:
https://www.guayaquil.gob.ec/municipio-y-universidadde-
guayaquil-firman-convenios-para-que-estudiantesrealicen-
practicas-preprofesionales/
Martens P, E.-S. M.-J. (2016). The emotional lives of
companion animals: Attachment and subjective claims by
owners of cats and dogs. Anthrozoös(29), 73–88.
Morrison R, R. J. (2014). A 6‐month observational study of
changes in objectively measured physical activity during
weight loss in dogs. Journal of Small Animal Practice(55),
–570.
Mullis RA, W. A. (2015). Maintenance energy requirements of
odor detection, explosive detection and human detection
working dogs. PeerJ(3), e767.
NS., R. (23 de February de 2010). Recuperado el 05 de octubre
de 2021, de Slate: https://slate.com/technology/2010/02/
the-environmental-impact-of-pet-food.html
Nutrition NRCCoA. (1971). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry.
National Academies Press.
PBL. (2013). Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
(PBL). Agency NEA.
Pimentel D, P. M. (2003). Sustainability of meat-based and
plant-based diets and the environment. American Journal
of Clinical Nutrition(78), 660S–663S.
R., A. (December de 2009). Polluting pets: The devastating
impact of man’s best friend. Independent.
Reijnders L, S. S. (2003). Quantification of the environmental
impact of different dietary protein choices. American
Journal of Clinical Nutrition(78), 664S–668S.
Rushforth R, M. M. (2013). Finding Your Dog’s Ecological
“Pawprint”: A Hybrid EIO-LCA of Dog Food Manufacturing.
Arizona State University.
Su B, K. N. (2018a). How Japanese companion dog and cat
owners’ degree of attachment relates to the attribution of
emotions to their animals. PLOS ONE(13).
Su B, M. P. (2018). Environmental impacts of food consumption
by companion dogs and cats in Japan. Ecological
Indicators(93), 1043–1049.
Su B, M. P.-S.-J. (2018b). A neglected predictor of
environmental damage: The ecological paw print and
carbon emissions of food consumption by companion dogs
and cats in China. Journal of Cleaner Production(194),
–11.
Swanson KS, C. R. (2013). Nutritional sustainability of pet
foods. Advances in Nutrition: An International Review
Journal(4), 141–150.
Vale, V. (2009). Time to Eat the Dog? The Real Guide to
Sustainable Living. En V. Vale, Time to Eat the Dog? The
Real Guide to Sustainable Living. Thames and Hudson.
Wackernagel M, R. W. (1998a). Our Ecological Footprint:
Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. New Society
Publishers.
Wackernagel M, R. W. (1998b). Our Ecological Footprint:
Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. New Society
Publishers.
Westhoek H, R. T. (2011). The Protein Puzzle: The Consumption
and Production of Meat, Dairy and Fish in the European
Union. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
Wirsenius S, A. C. (2010). How much land is needed for
global food production under scenarios of dietary changes
and livestock productivity increases in 2030? Agricultural
Systems(103), 621–638.
Wood L, G.-C. B. (2005). The pet connection: Pets as a
conduit for social capital? Social Science and Medicine(61),
–1173.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Cristian Sáenz De Viteri, Pablo Torres

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.