Urban strategies for the reactivation of public space in the central area of Cuenca, Ecuador
Main Article Content
Abstract
Urbanism in cities has consolidated a means of accelerated real estate development that does not have enough development of public spaces that go unnoticed by most users, a similar case is visualized in the Central Helmet of Cuenca where crime and the characteristics of the design of furniture in public space give way to being abandoned and that they are dangerous steps for users. Several strategies can be used to reactivate public spaces, including Encouraging community participation, creating a sense of ownership, improving pedestrian accessibility, creating a sense of security, place relevance, encouraging active transportation, and improving the green areas used. Through the study of the territory by components, the integral diagnosis is proposed to obtain new urban strategies for the design of public spaces. The general objective of the project is the creation of strategic guidelines that contribute to the reactivation of public space. In conclusion, it is obtained that the application of strategies guided to the accessibility, safety, and relevance of the place would generate growth in the use of public spaces for their reactivation in 86% of the users surveyed.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
A. Serra-Llobet and M. A. Hermida, “Opportunities for green infrastructure under Ecuador’s new legal framework,” Landsc. Urban Plan., vol. 159, pp. 1–4, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.02.004.
K. B. de Castro et al., “New perspectives in land use mapping based on urban morphology: A case study of the Federal District, Brazil,” Land use policy, vol. 87, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104032.
A.-A. Gavrilidis, A.-M. Popa, M.-R. Nita, D.-A. Onose, and D.-L. Badiu, “Planning the ‘unknown’: Perception of urban green infrastructure concept in Romania,” Urban For. Urban Green., vol. 51, p. 126649, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126649.
A. Macmillan, J. Connor, K. Witten, R. Kearns, D. Rees, and A. Woodward, “The societal costs and benefits of commuter bicycling: Simulating the effects of specific policies using system dynamics modeling,” Environ. Health Perspect., vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 335–344, 2014, doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307250.
A. J. Lynch, “Creating Effective Urban Greenways and Stepping-stones: Four Critical Gaps in Habitat Connectivity Planning Research,” Journal of Planning Literature, vol. 34, no. 2. SAGE Publications Inc., pp. 131–155, May 01, 2019. doi: 10.1177/0885412218798334.
Z. Zhang, S. Meerow, J. P. Newell, and M. Lindquist, “Enhancing landscape connectivity through multifunctional green infrastructure corridor modeling and design,” Urban For. Urban Green., vol. 38, pp. 305–317, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.10.014.
R. Velho, C. Holloway, A. Symonds, and B. Balmer, “The Effect of Transport Accessibility on the Social Inclusion of Wheelchair Users: A Mixed Method Analysis,” Soc. Incl., vol. 4, no. 3, p. 24, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.17645/si.v4i3.484.
I. Essadeq, E. Dubail, and E. Jeanniere, “Modelling Passenger Congestion in Transit System –Benchmark and Three Case Studies,” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 14, pp. 1792–1801, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.TRPRO.2016.05.145.
S. N. de Planificación, Plan de Creación de Oportunidades 2021-2025. Ecuador, 2021, p. 122. Accessed: Mar. 24, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.planificacion.gob.ec/plan-de-creacion-de-oportunidades-2021-2025/
V. R. Ibárcena, “Criterios de diseño y transformación de los espacios públicos en los asentamientos humanos de Perú: estudio del espacio público en las ciudades informales,” Valencia, 2018. Accessed: Jun. 20, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/99585
A. C. Oliveira and C. Alho, “The new smart cities. Cities built from scratch and old cities transformed into smart cities. Sustainable growth,” in Challenges for Technology Innovation: An Agenda for the Future - Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Smart Manufacturing, S2M 2016, 2017, pp. 311–314. doi: 10.1201/9781315198101-62.